You fly the drone. We report the findings.

Crop Counting & Emergence

Plant, tree and vine counts from your imagery — orchard inventories, emergence rates by field zone, and gap mapping for replanting decisions.

RGB

What we check for

  • Plant, tree or vine counts — sample-based or whole-block
  • Emergence rate broken down by field zone
  • Gap clusters and their likely cause where visible
  • Row spacing and planting-pattern consistency
  • Counting method stated plainly in the report so the figure can be trusted

An example of what you get back

Every finding in every report follows the same structure — location, frame reference, affected area, confidence, probable cause and recommended action, rated Red / Amber / Green. Here's a worked (illustrative) example from this survey type.

Finding 1: North-West Corner — Emergence Gap Cluster

LocationField 4, north-west corner, approx. 0.4 ha
Frame referenceDJI_1102–1108
Estimated affected areaApprox. 0.4 ha, whole-block count
ConfidenceHigh
Severity rating (RAG)AMBER

Observation: Emergence in this zone is measured at 63%, against a whole-field average of 91%, visible as a distinct gap cluster rather than scattered individual gaps.

Probable cause: Consistent with a localised establishment issue — pooling water, seed placement, or pest pressure are all plausible on RGB evidence alone.

Recommended action: Recommend a ground check of this zone before deciding whether to replant; pattern is consistent with a fixable cause rather than field-wide failure.

Marked-up count imagery, gap cluster outlined

See a full sample report →

How the RAG rating works

Every finding on every survey type is rated against the same published definitions, so a Red on one job means the same thing as a Red on the next.

● RedA live risk of water ingress, structural risk, or a safety hazard — flagged for prompt action.
● AmberLikely to progress to failure if left unaddressed, but not currently causing a problem.
● GreenCosmetic or early-stage — worth recording, not urgent.